Dear Editor – Raglan buses

May 10, 2017

Dear Editor,

Thank you for publicising the new buses. The bike rack works fine, though the bike sways around disconcertingly. I look forward to seeing surfboards on the new racks. It looks like they should work well too.

What doesn’t work well is having a gap of over 4 hours in the timetable and going back to a Sunday bus with only 2hrs 30mins in Hamilton, rather than the current 6hrs 15mins. How can NZ Transport Agency describe that as “a high quality transport option”?

Although the consultation earlier in the year showed the bus as going out to Manu Bay at weekends throughout the year, the timetable now shows that it ended at Easter. A pity surfers won’t get a chance to try out those racks until October. The $4.50 fare may put them off too. Hamilton fares are expensive at $3.80, but we have to pay even more.

It was also unfortunate that the publicity didn’t include mention that the 11.20 has been retimed to run at 1.40; hope there weren’t many passengers left waiting.

rag-bus

Despite global warming concerns and the fuel efficiency of buses, local and national politicians seem to show little interest in getting our bus use up from the current 2% or so to the 20% or more found in most other OECD countries. Why?

Regards

John Lawson.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

The Latest Issue

The Latest Issue

Raglan Surf School

Raglan Surf School

SUPERVALUE RAGLAN

SUPERVALUE RAGLAN

Categories

Previous Story

Dear Editor – ANZAC Pride

Next Story

Dear Editor – Reminiscence

Latest from Letters to the Editor

Dear Editor – RAS

Dear Editor, I am writing in response to Sarah Johnson’s letter to the editor last week regarding the RAS story I wrote